[bongo-devel] Re: Marks

[Daniel Jensen]

Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>
>> No, we were talking about killing the marking.
>
> I don't know what you mean here, but maybe it is not important?

No, never mind that.

>> We should add this functionality to the command now. We can just write
>> it into the command, but I think we need the "selection" of tracks in
>> a utility function.
>
> Yes, that's probably a good idea.  As for what to call this
> concept, I think `selection' is pretty good --- at least for
> internal purposes.  There's already the concept of `secondary
> selection' though.

Yes. I think track selection is good for internal use.

As for the user interface, I don't think there is a need to introduce
the concept. Where it is described, no information is lost if only the
different kinds of selections are listed.