[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Andreas Breitbach |
Subject: |
[Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:12:00 +0200 |
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen.
Be sure to consult the FAQ section in the manual before submitting
a bug report. In addition check if the bug is reproducable with an
up-to-date version of AUCTeX. So please upgrade to the version
available from http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ if your
installation is older than the one available from the web site.
If the bug is triggered by a specific (La)TeX file, you should try
to produce a minimal sample file showing the problem and include it
in your report.
Your bug report will be posted to the AUCTeX bug reporting list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm using Biblatex instead of Bibtex, for which AucTex/RefTex seems to
be preconfigured. The basic functions like inserting citations,
bibliographies and so on work quite well. But there's some very strange
behavior when i use the folowing lines in my .emacs
(setq reftex-cite-format "\\footcite[]{%l}")
(setq reftex-cite-prompt-optional-args t),
all i do get is "reftex-do-citation: Args out of range: 21, 37"(I think
the numbers change from time to time...). The expected behaviour would
be to insert the optional argument(which follows the citation, ie. a
page number) after the citation. It would be really nice to have the
possibility to insert the page of a certain citation directly in the
described way instead of doing M-b and insert the required characters
manually.
Is there anything else where i could look up how this behaviour is
caused, or what I could try to fix it? There don't seem to be many
problems like this one(with RefTex), according to Google.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Andreas Breitbach
Emacs : GNU Emacs 22.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.1)
of 2008-09-05 on vernadsky, modified by Ubuntu
Package: 11.85
current state:
==============
(setq
AUCTeX-date "2008-02-10"
window-system 'x
LaTeX-version "2e"
TeX-style-path '("style" "auto"
"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style"
"/home/andy/.emacs.d/var/auctex")
TeX-auto-save nil
TeX-parse-self t
TeX-master nil
TeX-command-list '(("TeX" "%(PDF)%(tex) %`%S%(PDFout)%(mode)%' %t"
TeX-run-TeX nil (plain-tex-mode ams-tex-mode texinfo-mode) :help
"Run plain TeX")
("LaTeX" "%`%l%(mode)%' %t" TeX-run-TeX nil (latex-mode
doctex-mode) :help "Run LaTeX")
("Makeinfo" "makeinfo %t" TeX-run-compile nil
(texinfo-mode) :help
"Run Makeinfo with Info output")
("Makeinfo HTML" "makeinfo --html %t" TeX-run-compile nil
(texinfo-mode) :help "Run Makeinfo with HTML output")
("AmSTeX" "%(PDF)amstex %`%S%(PDFout)%(mode)%' %t"
TeX-run-TeX nil
(ams-tex-mode) :help "Run AMSTeX")
("ConTeXt" "texexec --once --texutil %(execopts)%t"
TeX-run-TeX
nil (context-mode) :help "Run ConTeXt once")
("ConTeXt Full" "texexec %(execopts)%t" TeX-run-TeX nil
(context-mode) :help "Run ConTeXt until completion")
("BibTeX" "bibtex %s" TeX-run-BibTeX nil t :help "Run
BibTeX")
("View" "%V" TeX-run-discard t t :help "Run Viewer")
("Print" "%p"
TeX-run-command t t :help "Print the file")
("Queue" "%q" TeX-run-background nil t :help "View the
printer
queue" :visible TeX-queue-command)
("File" "%(o?)dvips %d -o %f " TeX-run-command t t :help
"Generate
PostScript file")
("Index" "makeindex %s" TeX-run-command nil t :help "Create
index
file")
("Check" "lacheck %s" TeX-run-compile nil (latex-mode) :help
"Check LaTeX file for correctness")
("Spell" "(TeX-ispell-document \"\")" TeX-run-function nil
t :help
"Spell-check the document")
("Clean" "TeX-clean" TeX-run-function nil t :help "Delete
generated intermediate files")
("Clean All" "(TeX-clean t)" TeX-run-function nil t :help
"Delete
generated intermediate and output files")
("Other" "" TeX-run-command t t :help "Run an arbitrary
command"))
)
- [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Andreas Breitbach <=
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/03
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/05
- [Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Matthew Lundin, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/08
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/11
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/23