[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:05:45 +0200 |
* Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-08) writes:
> Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
>>
>> You can get a backtrace by executing
>> M-x toggle-debug-on-error <RET>
>> before trying to insert the citation.
>>
>> The problem might be due to something in the the .tex or .bib files. So
>> unless you provide sample files for reproducing the error, it will be
>> hard to find its cause.
>>
> Ok, I tried these settings, these are the results:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (args-out-of-range 21 37)
> replace-match("[34]" t t #("\\footcite[]{masala_kenneth_2005}" 0 12
> nil 12 31 (face font-lock-constant-face) 31 32 nil))
> reftex-do-citation(nil nil nil)
> reftex-citation()
> call-interactively(reftex-citation)
This doesn't really help. As mentioned before, a sample file might be
useful.
> The reftex-*-citation complains on clicking that it "Can't find
> library /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-cite.el". There are
> some files in the respective directory, but they seem to be compiled
> bytecode, having an *.elc.
Are you sure the installation of the CVS version went okay? Didn't you
install it below /usr/local? Did you put `(require 'reftex)' into your
init file as suggested by the installation instructions? What's the
output of `C-h v reftex-version <RET>'?
--
Ralf
- [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/03
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/03
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/05
- [Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Matthew Lundin, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/08
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26