bug-auctex
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex


From: Ralf Angeli
Subject: Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:25:26 +0200

* Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-26) writes:

> Ok, that's exactly what I did.
> Removed Emacs and anything connected with it, reinstalled it(The
> respective packages were emacs22, emacs22-common, emacs,
> emacs22-bin-common, emacs22-gtk, emacsen-common and emcas-goodies-el).
>
> Then I downloaded the Makefile from CVS, having this content: 
> # Where local software is found
> prefix=/usr/local
>
> # Where info files go.
> infodir=$(prefix)/share/info
>
> # Where local lisp files go.
> lispdir=$(prefix)/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex

So I presume there is now the directory
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex which contains RefTeX's Elisp
files?

> The fun starts when Emacs then gives "RefTeX version 4.31", and at the
> same time "This manual documents RefTeX version 2009-04-29 from
> 2009-04-29."(as I did the proposals mentioned below) I also looked for
> the library, reftex-base is not found,
> but /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex.elc, which is the
> original one from the Emacs package done by Ubuntu.

What's the output of `C-h v load-path <RET>'?

-- 
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]