RE: Test framework

[Chad Yates]

> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 10:46:08AM -0800, Chad Yates wrote:
> > I would have to agree the cppunit tree was pretty organized.  I have no
> > opinion on the naming for the test files, just as long as the
> word test is
> > in there somewhere, and that they are consistent.  I've used
> <Class>Test for
> > what I've done, but will gladly change to test_<class> if that is the
> > direction we want to go. cppunit has a contrib directory, is that
> > conceptually the same thing as common c++'s patches directory?
> >
>
>       As far as I know there is no contrib nor patches dir in cc++.

sorry, my bad.  I think the directory i was looking at was on my end and was
created sometime ago to hold some patches from savannah and/or the list.
(urlparser, ssl, and urlstring before they were added).

>       Yes, some headers could be partitioned, digest.h could be a
> header that just includes md5.h, sha.h, etc, composing a kind of
> digest subsistem. I think that whether one header should hold one or
> more classes depends on the structure of the system. For instance, SHA
> is implemented with several classes; I would see it very extreme to
> make one header for each class.

I agree.  should I go ahead and re-org the persistence engine or digest
classes when I have time, and then submit the resulting structure?

,chad