[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dfa.c order of include problem
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: dfa.c order of include problem |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:24:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 |
Hi Eric.
> >> Rather, doesn't that mean that <regex.h> should #include <limits.h>
> >> prior to redefining RE_DUP_MAX, to be sure that it overrides any limits
> >> that would otherwise be present in the system headers?
> >
> > That would be nice, but hell will likely freeze over before glibc
> > updates it for us.
>
> Glibc <regex.h> does not have the problem,
How is that so? The undef of RE_DUP_MAX and redefine is there.
If limits.h is included after regex.h, then the value from limits.h
is applied.
Thanks,
Arnold