[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dfa.c order of include problem
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: dfa.c order of include problem |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:31:52 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 01/31/13 12:24, Aharon Robbins wrote:
>> Glibc <regex.h> does not have the problem,
> How is that so? The undef of RE_DUP_MAX and redefine is there.
> If limits.h is included after regex.h, then the value from limits.h
> is applied.
But in Glibc the two definitions are equivalent (identical preprocessor
token lists), so it's valid C and there's no problem.