[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:30:24 +0000 |
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 14:26 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I noticed that for some reason I can't see the midi instruments drop
> down in
>
> Ubuntu. I see a little arrow to view the possible instruments but the
> arrow does nothing.
>
What versions of Gtk does
denemo --version
report? Gtk is getting increasingly remote from the API we started
with ...
The staff_properties_change() function is the one to break at in gdb and
instrument_list is the variable that should be populated by the time
line 226 of src/ui/staffpropdialog.c is reached
Richard
BTW I notice that this list is not freed as it should be, evidently at
one time it was static, and then, presumably to allow a change of
soundfont, it has been made dynamic and yet it it still tested to see if
it needs populating, and it is not freed. I'll raise a bug about that,
it's not a showstopper.
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeremiah Benham
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks, I will test this out.
>
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Richard Shann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 10:03 -0600, Jeremiah Benham
> wrote:
> > How do I create an instrument template like this for
> other
> > instruments?
>
> I realised there were bugs in my MidiInstrumentName
> script, and I've
> arranged for it to be run when you set the MIDI
> instrument in the
> (built-in) staff properties.
> I updated the Clarinet in Bb template.
> In git now.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Richard Shann, 2016/01/10
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/10
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Richard Shann, 2016/01/11
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/11
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Richard Shann, 2016/01/11
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Richard Shann, 2016/01/12
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/12
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/14
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Richard Shann, 2016/01/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Playback View: an important advance for Denemo, Richard Shann, 2016/01/16
- [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Richard Shann, 2016/01/15
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/15
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Richard Shann, 2016/01/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Richard Shann, 2016/01/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Jeremiah Benham, 2016/01/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Instrument templates (was Re: Playback View: an important advance for Denemo), Richard Shann, 2016/01/16