Re: GNUstep directory layout

[Dennis Leeuw]

Hi all,

In proposal 2 Stefan Urbanek opts for an additional Developer domain, as is
available in the current GNUstep directory tree.

I can see the point of this: to keep certain resources restricted to
certain groups of users. A local sysadmin could even add additional groups.
Which could save on search times by telling the system that it should
adjust it's search paths for certain users to include or exclude some of
these grouped directories.
Developer is, next to Administrat(or/ion), the only default supplied
domain(s).

I think it isn't a very stupid idea. What are the ideas of other people
about this? And Stefan did I understand it correctly that the above
description is your point?

Dennis Leeuw


Adam Fedor wrote:

> I've been slow getting this going, but I think I'm ready now.
>
> Rather than start some war on the mailing list asking for opinions, I've
> posted a document online which has one version of what the GNUstep
> directory layout should look like:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnustep/developers/schedule.html#Directory
>
> (it doesn't seem to be on some mirrors yet).
> if you don't like it (or do like it), send me your comments and I'll
> update it to match whatever consensus forms.
>
> --
> Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
> http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
>                                        | know how I hate the stuff.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep