[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep directory layout
From: |
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep directory layout |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:54:12 +0200 |
>On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>> Uhmm, are you sure about this? IHMO usr stands for Unix System
Resources,
>> and this explains also why bin and lib are there.
>
>I don't know where did you get that from, but more authentic sources
>suggest it otherwise. See:
>http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/notes.html
Well, I heared (or read) it somewhere, but a quick Google Search yields
the following:
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22unix+system+resources%22+usr&btnG=Google-Suche&meta=
(put the link together again) and you'll see some results. Not so many,
but it proves that my idea was not completely bollocks.
>
>Greetings,
>BALATON Zoltan
greetings, Lars
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Dennis Leeuw, 2002/09/07
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Jim Balhoff, 2002/09/07
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Martin Brecher, 2002/09/06
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/09
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, BALATON Zoltan, 2002/09/09
- Re: GNUstep directory layout,
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <=
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/10
- GNUstep directory layout, Adam Fedor, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, David Wetzel, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, David Ayers, 2002/09/11