[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backart - default backend?
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: backart - default backend? |
Date: |
17 Feb 2005 03:03:19 GMT |
MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Any or all of the above may be my fault and I'll try to rebuild
> some things properly (following instructions carefully, taking
> logs and all that) later today to test, but I'd welcome hearing
> about advances since November on any of the above.
Further to the above: I tried, but the current back-art release
doesn't compile with the current freetype. Reported as bug
12009. Looks like it might be fixed in CVS, but I guess it can't
be enough to affect release dates. After all, freetype 2.1.8 had
been out for about 5 months already when back 0.9.4 was released.
So, I wonder how many non-CVS users use back-art? Is it
premature to talk about switching defaults?
--
MJR/slef
- Re: backart - default backend?, (continued)
- Re: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/15
- Re: backart - default backend?,
MJ Ray <=
- Message not available
- EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/17
- Re: EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, Adam Fedor, 2005/02/17
- Re: EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2005/02/18
- Message not available
- Re: EWMH, WWW/apps and reasons to migrate, was: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/18
Re: backart - default backend?, MJ Ray, 2005/02/17