Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty))

[Rogelio Serrano]

On 3/24/07, Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2007, at 17:57, Nicolas Roard wrote:
> > But providing a browser implementing standard (X)HTML ? it's
> > not that hard imho.
>
> Well, its probably not hard from a functional point of view. But
> getting it sufficiently fast (especially CSS) might be not as trivial.
> But thats just pure guesswork, we'll see what Nikolaus comes up with.
>
> > And such a "simple" browser would be already quite
> > neat (documentation, etc), even if perhaps you won't be able to use it
> > to connect to your bank account...
>
> Definitely.

unless it was an atom protocol based website and uses xhtml only. even
without javascript and cookies you can do a lot.

--
the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items