|
From: | Alessandro Sangiuliano |
Subject: | Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab |
Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:40:57 +0100 |
I think we should see what is the best choice for GNUstep making it to be accessible to users and developers as easy as we can, so: - Github: fork code with a button; start a new repo with a button; easy management of merge request, not so bad in showing diffs; interesting plugins; maybe not so nice in bug tracking; it uses git that is OPEN SOURCE, you are not forced to use its proprietary front-end; it is probably the most used platform to host code; it is full of people; what we need absolutely… people! - I never heard about Gitlab before, so I can’t talk about it. - Savannah: Seems a place where requests take weeks before to be completed; it doesn’t have the Github features in managing repos and projects; it looks a bit abandoned; to contribute to a project a person has to ask for an account and then for permissions. On github a person can fork the code, contribute to it, then does a merge request and project managers can accept it or just discard it in an easy way. I vote for Github. Alex.
----------------------------------------------------------------- A: "Hey dude, where are you from?" B: “I’m from Uros” A: “What?” B: “Uros, the Uranos' world capital” A: “Hey dude, you look so strange and white. You should eat some meat!” B: “We don’t need to eat” A: “Hey man, that dude looks so strange, He doesn’t need to eat” C: “OMG! So strange, he also is so white!” D: “Why do I have to hunt to eat and survive and he doesn’t need to eat to survive? I hate him!” <…>
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |