[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 12:43:16 -0500 |
The question is, should DocBook output be treated as Info, HTML, and
XML (in which case @ifinfo should be replaced by @ifnottex)
That seems best to me. I don't see any good reason to do otherwise, and
trying to merge Docbook and TeX parts seems unnecessarily problematic.
Docbook is definitely used online as well as printed books. Many free
documentation projects use it.
Of course, it's best to avoid these Texinfo conditionals entirely,
whenever possible.
karl
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, (continued)
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/22
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/20
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/18
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/18
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/18
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Robert J. Chassell, 2006/05/19