[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 21:10:09 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:43:16 -0500
> From: address@hidden (Karl Berry)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> The question is, should DocBook output be treated as Info, HTML, and
> XML (in which case @ifinfo should be replaced by @ifnottex)
>
> That seems best to me. I don't see any good reason to do otherwise, and
> trying to merge Docbook and TeX parts seems unnecessarily problematic.
Thanks.
Luc, I withdraw my reservations. Please go ahead and commit your
changes.
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, (continued)
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/22
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/20
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/18
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/18
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/18
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Robert J. Chassell, 2006/05/19