[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?
From: |
Daiki Ueno |
Subject: |
Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region? |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:49:11 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> In <address@hidden>
>>>>> Daiki Ueno <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>> In <address@hidden>
> >>>>> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> wrote:
> > [ Adding emacs-devel; therefore not trimming quotes. See
> > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/43396/focus=52626> for
> > the rest of the discussion. ]
> Huh? I don't understand you refered to that article, there is no
> related issue with allout.el.
Anyway, if you mention the security problem of PGG, you should also
mention the multibyteness problem
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62428
Which causes PGG almost unusable by users who use mutibyte locales.
I would say that Gnus developers have horribly degraded the quality of
PGG since it was merged into Gnus...
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
- Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region? (was: pgg-gpg-process-region), Reiner Steib, 2006/09/02
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/02
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?,
Daiki Ueno <=
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/03
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/03
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/04
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/04
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/05
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/05
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/07