[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:02:08 -0400 |
> It seems easier, but in fact to DTRT according to the documentation
> above means dropping support for Windows 95, 98 and ME, and modifying
> ALL system messages to use Unicode, which is major work. I think it is
> worth doing that for Emacs 22, because Windows 98 and ME are almost dead
> now, and probably will be by the time Emacs 22 s released, and also with
> the change of Emacs' internal representation, Unicode fits better.
I added an entry to etc/TODO based on this.
As I've already said, I think this change would probably be a bad
thing. People can try it and see whether it works well enough
on the old Windows versions. But if it doesn't, I think it should
not be installed.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/04