[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:20:54 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:59:20 -0400
>
> >> 2 - Use the Cygwin version of Emacs.
> > Not really an option, since Cygwin doesn't support Windows 9x very
> > well (if at all), AFAIK.
>
> Hmm... oh but wait, don't they get to be able to use the MS-DOS
> port instead?
Isn't that 2 days late?
(MS-DOS port supports only a single non-ASCII locale, and on W9x that
locale cannot be changed without rebooting the machine.)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Davis Herring, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/04