[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:24:43 -0500 |
In 21.1.90, point is placed at point-min, so that you have to actively
scroll the window to see compilation output. I really don't like it!
I made that change because someone complained about the old behavior.
The old behavior is inconsistent, doing one thing in the first compilation
and something else in a recompilation.
The new behavior is consistent: it does the same thing for the second
compilation and the first.
- [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/04
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Chong Yidong, 2008/02/04
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/05
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/05
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, David Kastrup, 2008/02/06
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Miles Bader, 2008/02/07