[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:08:56 +0900 |
Jay Belanger writes:
> A while back, I came across a note saying that any package that is
> developed within Emacs shouldn't have it's own version numbering. I've
> looked in vain for that note, but have been unable to find it. However,
> Calc is now a fully owned subsidiary of Emacs, Inc., so is there any
> reason why Calc should have its own version number?
XEmacs packages it separately, and will continue to do so for the
foreseeable future. Until y'all move to a tree-oriented VCS version
numbers (and tags in the Calc portion of the tree) would be helpful in
comparing what we got to upstream.
- Re: Release plans, (continued)
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/02
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/03
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/04
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/04
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/05
Re: Release plans, Davi Leal, 2008/08/01
Re: Release plans, Jay Belanger, 2008/08/01
Re: Release plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/02
Re: Release plans, dhruva, 2008/08/04
Re: Release plans, A Soare, 2008/08/12