Re: configure.in support for FreeBSD ia64/sparc64/powerpc

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:06:04 -0800 (PST), Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas <address@hidden> writes:
>
>   > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:39:36 -0800 (PST), Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
>   > >Ulrich Mueller <address@hidden> writes:
>   > >>> We know for sure that the original code works.
>   > >>
>   > >> It doesn't work on FreeBSD.
>   > >
>   > > You were proposing to change the Solaris code.
>   >
>   > Err, I think there's a misunderstanding here.  The src/alloc.c change
>   > is related to sparc64 not Solaris (not _only_ Solaris, that is):
>
>   >     --- a/src/alloc.c     Fri Oct 27 15:45:51 2006 +0000
>   >     +++ b/src/alloc.c     Sat Oct 28 01:49:45 2006 +0300
>   >     @@ -4560,7 +4560,11 @@ mark_stack ()
>   >           needed on ia64 too.  See mach_dep.c, where it also says inline
>   >           assembler doesn't work with relevant proprietary compilers.
>   >     */
>   >      #ifdef sparc
>   >     +#ifdef __sparc64__
>   >     +  asm ("flushw");
>   >     +#else
>   >        asm ("ta 3");
>   >     +#endif
>   >      #endif
>   >
>   > Now, I don't think anybody would argue that there are probably far more
>   > Solaris installations of sparc64 than FreeBSD ones.
>
> Exactly, that code has been running for all other systems just fine for
> many years.  Why the insistence to change without proper testing?
> Why not just make the conditional
>  defined (__sparc64__) && defined (__FreeBSD__) ?

My impression from the original Gentoo bug <http://bugs.gentoo.org/159584>
is that this affects Linux too, so making the code depend on __FreeBSD__
doesn't solve Ulrich's original problem.