[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving to bzr?
From: |
马旋(SuperMMX) |
Subject: |
Re: Moving to bzr? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:21:41 +0800 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi, dhruva <address@hidden> :
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:37:08 +0530
dhruva <address@hidden> wrote:
> I tried with:
> bzr pull http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-ce/trunk/ --remember
>
> And it works. It appears faster but am still using the 'http' and not
> 'bzr'. In git, that makes a big difference and it is suggested to use
> 'git' protocol. Is there something similar in bzr?
> I feel 'bzr' expects the server to be running on port 4155. When I try
> 'telnet bzr.notengoamigos.org 4155', it fails to connect and hence I
> feel the bzr server is down.
>
> -dhruva
I regularly pull updates from the same host with http about once a week,
and from my experience the speed is almost consistent, the time is about
1m - 1m30s.
Never tried bzr:// before.
- --
A. Because it makes the logic of the discussion difficult to follow.
Q. Why shoudn't I top post?
A. No.
Q Should I top post?
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is it bad?
A: No, it's bad.
Q: Should I top post in replies to mailing lists?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAkli+HYACgkQYjhzyV/TMxs2UACfQYUppevLidmgWRqVAmV+cL5z
E/oAniax6Z3E0eF/wRw79ysK72RjQMfC
=SW2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Moving to bzr?, (continued)
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Nick Roberts, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Message not available
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/06
- Re: Moving to bzr?,
马旋(SuperMMX) <=
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Daniel Clemente, 2009/01/06
Re: Moving to bzr?, Tassilo Horn, 2009/01/04