[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?

From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:13:54 +0900
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shij┼Ź) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

Richard, is it OK with you to keep the following features only for a
proprietary platform (Cocoa) in the Emacs 23.1 release?  Note that the
GNUstep port is now completely unusable.

                                     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu

>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:12:45 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> 
>>>>> said:

> What I removed was:

>   1. Code for stippling.  This is wrongly implemented as tiling, which
>      has been controversial whether or not to be included in the other
>      platforms, IIUC.
>   2. Code for interpreting incompatible color formats: RGBrrggbb,
>      ARGBaarrggbb, HSVhhssvv, AHSVaahhssvv, and CMYKccmmyykk.  Besides
>      the format itself, support for the alpha-component in color is
>      not found in the other platforms but not inherently NS-specific.
>   3. Lisp primitive ns-set-alpha (nsfns.m), which sets the alpha
>      component of the given color to the specified value.  As in the
>      argument for the alpha-component above, this is not inherently
>      NS-specific.
>   4. Lisp function ns-set-background-alpha (ns-win.el), which sets
>      alpha-component of frame background color.  It is different from
>      the frame parameter `alpha' as Adrian explained.  Again, this is
>      not inherently NS-specific.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]