Re: bzr workflow

[Jan Djärv]

Óscar Fuentes skrev:

> There is something that I disagree with BzrForEmacsDevs: a quickfix that
> requires more than one commit or that spans so long in time to warrant a
> merge from upstream does not qualify as a quickfix for me.

This is too simple.  There have been many times in the CVS days when I tried 
to commit a change only to find out there was a conflict (usually ChangeLog). 
 So I always merge from upstream before committing to upstream.  So what you 
are saying is in fact, there are no quick fixes.

What starts out as a (presumed) quickfix often turns in to a week/month long 
fix.  To assume that one can always beforehand descide if one is about to do a 
quickfix or not is also too simple minded.

Bzr feels very strange and uncomfortable.  It is workable, but not smooth or 
elegant, just kind of icky.

        Jan D.