[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!
From: |
chad |
Subject: |
Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests! |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:53:03 -0700 |
On 14 Mar 2013, at 06:49, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> was fine. If people really don't want to depend on the external program, I'll
>> remove it and just use `tar-mode'.
>
> On GNU/Linux, Mac OS X, Cygwin, ..., there's very little risk in
> assuming that `tar' is available.
> But IIUC under Windows the picture is completely different.
Does the Windows-side picture get any better for zip instead of tar
or tar+gunzip? When I last had to care, the variations in unzip on
Windows were pretty annoying, but in those days Windows 95 was
common and NT 3.51 was `a good sign'. Hopefully, the situation
has improved.
~Chad
- cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Daniel Hackney, 2013/03/11
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Tom Tromey, 2013/03/11
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/12
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/12
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Daniel Hackney, 2013/03/14
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/14
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/14
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/14
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!,
chad <=
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Daniel Hackney, 2013/03/15
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/15
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/15
- Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/20
Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests!, Daniel Hackney, 2013/03/12