[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards"

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards"
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:09:35 +0200

> From: Noah Lavine <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:58:28 -0400
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>, 
>       Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
> To continue a tangent, if adding an explicit isnan() makes the code run any
> slower, I think you should file a bug with GCC to get that fixed.

I don't think GCC is a problem: isnan is a builtin function there, so
even a function call overhead is spared.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]