|Subject:||Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards"|
|Date:||Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:28:11 -0400|
> From: Noah Lavine <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:58:28 -0400
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>,
> Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
>I don't think GCC is a problem: isnan is a builtin function there, so
> To continue a tangent, if adding an explicit isnan() makes the code run any
> slower, I think you should file a bug with GCC to get that fixed.
even a function call overhead is spared.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|