[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
|
From: |
Barry Warsaw |
|
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:31:40 -0400 |
On Mar 26, 2013, at 03:42 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>I still think git is a horrible DVCS
I happen to agree. Mercurial is much better, though I still prefer Bazaar.
Mercurial is also GPLv2 and has free (as in $) hosting facilities available.
FWIW, I tend to think that people like git because of github more than because
of git in particular. Unfortunately github is not free software AFAIK.
Neither is Bitbucket (probably the most popular hosting site for Mercurial
branches). OTOH, Launchpad (the most popular bzr hosting site) *is* free
software too.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/04/03
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/03
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/04/03
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Andreas Schwab, 2013/04/04
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/04
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/04/04
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/04/05
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/04/05
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/04/06
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Barry Warsaw <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Timur Aydin, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Teemu Likonen, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/02
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/04/02