[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git
|
From: |
David Engster |
|
Subject: |
Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git |
|
Date: |
Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:29:42 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 11:11 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Emacs shot itself in this foot with Bzr already.
>
> That wasn't the problem with bzr. The problems with bzr are technical,
> not social.
No, it is exactly the other way round. The switch happens because Bazaar
is a dead project.
> Its *algorithms* were unsalvageable.
Bazaar was quite capable of handling the Emacs source.
-David
- Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Kastrup, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Engster, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git,
David Engster <=
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Kastrup, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Kastrup, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Engster, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, David Engster, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Alan Mackenzie, 2014/01/04
- Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04