[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad UI defaults
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad UI defaults |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:08:34 -0400 |
I may have been confused about what they were, or looking in the wrong
place. I think they are probably all listed, but the description of
the default is definitely wrong, and it's not clear what determines
the appearance of the menu indicators I'm complaining about.
It still sounds like the manual can use improvement. If someone
explains to me what specific ideas need to be mentioned,
I will write the text.
- Re: bad UI defaults, (continued)
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/09/05
- Re: bad UI defaults, Jan D., 2003/09/05
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/07
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/06
- Re: bad UI defaults,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/02
Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/09/03
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/03
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/09/09