Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text

[Miles Bader]

Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> Alternatively and maybe better, we could, in light of Stefan's
> changes, undo the invisible-intangible subtlety mentioned in the NEWS
> (that would, in the worst case, make point appear to stand still for
> one single C-f instead of for an unlimited number of C-n's)

Note that the C-f behavior is also quite annoying.

By `undo the invisible-intangible subtlety mentioned in NEWS' do you
mean to eliminate the force-to-one-end behavior of `intangible', and
then recommend always using just `invisible'?

I notice that even lines hidden using only `invisible' cause weird C-n
glitches (it causes C-n to [appear to] move horizontally rather than
vertically after moving through an invisible line), though not as bad as
getting stuck completely.

-Miles
-- 
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
 that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
 less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.'  [The Economist]