Re: display problem

[Miles Bader]

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
>> The "19" should be "21" in the unicode branch.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what this magic number 19/21 is. Is there a
> constant for it that could be substituted?

Yeah, though it's a grody implementation detail, certainly this ought to
have a constant defined by the C code, if only to make the definition of
make-glyph-code more clear (though hopefully people will use
make-glyph-code instead!).

> I'm surprised that that is the only change needed. The code points
> between the unicode branch and Emacs 22 should be completely different,
> shouldn't they?

I assume most people get the codepoints themselves by loading a lisp
file or something, which uses an external encoding.

-Miles
-- 
`Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said.
`All the past could be forgiven.'   [NYT]