Re: [Fab-user] How important is making fabric parallel to everyone else?

[Timothee Besset]

Yes we would certainly have some interest in a parallel version.

TTimo

Matthew Wilson wrote:
> I was surprised when I saw how fabric iterated through all the hosts
> in sequence rather than in parallel.  For more than a few boxes and
> for a fairly long set of tasks, my upgrades are going to take a long
> time.
>
> Am I alone here?
>
> I've got some vague ideas about how to use subprocess or
> multiprocessing to add parallel work to fabric.  Anyone already
> working on this?  Maybe we could get some of this part figured out
> ahead of time.
>
> Matt
>
>