[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda
From: |
Xuan Baldauf |
Subject: |
[Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2001 00:27:03 +0200 |
PILCH Hartmut wrote:
> > You stated your position quite clearly.
>
> Maybe paranoid, due to an urgent desire to get things moving quickly, and
> a recent experience of too much terminology warfare. Btw I am already
> preparing a worldwide version of the petition, and the name
> petition.eurolinux.org is more likely to step back behind the alias
> www.noepatents.org in that case. You can already find the petition behind
> both, and that was always so.
>
> We have been thinking about the pros and cons of those two names that
> existed from the start. I myself like a name like ffii.org, because it
> makes the concept very clear. But that kind of clarity may not be the
> foremost function of short names. Some people say that this kind of
> abstract naming works only in Germany. But probably that is just flattery
> to the clichee of German fondness of philosophical abstraction.
> Unfortunately most people everywhere do not think in doctrines of whatever
> kind of freedom or openness, but in vague associations that can only at a
> later stage be complemented by rigid thinking. With most people, we don't
> ever get to that stage. The Linux penguin is a carrier of sympathy that
> helped the petition grow big. Also, it is understood to encompass some
> proprietary software that runs on that platform and to stand for a
> burgenoning sector in which Europe is strong. So it is a name that can
> well be associated with everything that stands behind the anti swpat
> movement. Astonishingly enough, most politicians who decide in our favor
> are not motivated by a real knowledge about the danger of swpat but by the
> feeling that the penguin bandwagon deserves their support. And even on a
> worldwide scale, it may not be bad marketing to present this as a movement
> that is related to "Europe" and "Linux". "no e-patents" is not all that
> much clearer and sounds negative. But we'll let people decide which name
> they prefer. We even have noepatents.com, so as to suggest that having no
> software patents is a source of wealth.
>
> A lot of work is needed and it is very good that you are pushing us to get
> crucial parts like the how-to-help document relaunched quickly.
>
> Cheers
I like your reasoning about strongly defined terms and words which are weakly
associated with a meaning due to human's fuzzy logic and "emotional reasoning".
Maybe I can help with the domains "save-our-software.de" and
"saveoursoftware.de", which both have a strong emotional association due to the
"SOS" relation. Yes, they are only .de-domains... Yet "save-our-software.org"
and "saveoursoftware.org" are still not reserved by anybody.
>
>
> --
> Hartmut Pilch
> Federation for a Free Information Infrastructure http://www.ffii.org/
> For a software patent free Europe PLEASE SIGN http://petition.eurolinux.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patinfo mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/patinfo
Xuân.
- [Fsfe-france] Software Patents Agenda, loic, 2001/05/13
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, PILCH Hartmut, 2001/05/14
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, loic, 2001/05/14
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, PILCH Hartmut, 2001/05/14
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, loic, 2001/05/14
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, PILCH Hartmut, 2001/05/14
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda,
Xuan Baldauf <=
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, loic, 2001/05/14
- [Fsfe-france] Re: Software Patents Agenda, loic, 2001/05/14