gchemutils-main
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gchemutils-main] The Gnome Chemistry Utils 0.9.90


From: Jean Bréfort
Subject: Re: [Gchemutils-main] The Gnome Chemistry Utils 0.9.90
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:45:21 +0200

Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 14:36 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> > Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 12:25 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> >> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> >>> This is the first beta for the 0.10 releases. 
> >>>
> >>> News are: 
> >>>
> >>> CGhemPaint: 
> >>>       * Fixed issues about residues management.
> >>>
> >>> Gnome Crystal: 
> >>>       * Add support for document properties.
> >>>
> >>> GChemTable: 
> >>>       * Add Brazilian to known languages.
> >>>
> >>> Other: 
> >>>       * Fixed some build issues (Daniel Leidert).
> >>>
> >>> Updated translation: fr.
> >>>
> >>> Sources are at:
> >>>
> >>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.bz2
> >>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>> It's now time to test, and update existing translations (or add new
> >>> ones). Before 0.10.0, I still need to update the applications
> >>> documentation and write some more API docs.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Jean
> >>>
> >> I was trying to update the Fedora RPM to 0.10 and I have noticed that
> >> the binaries and .desktop files (well, at least) contain -0.10 suffixes.
> >> Is this intended to stay like that?
> >>
> >> Kindest regards,
> >> Julian
> >>
> > Yes, it is wanted, so that different branches can be installed in
> > parallel. Also links are created, i.e. gchempaint -> gchempaint-0.10.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jean
> > 
> Also, is a devel package still necessary? For 0.8 it contained include
> files, pkgconfig file and api reference docs. None of these are
> installed as of 0.9.90, so I guess the devel package can go away and .so
> symlinks can go with the main package.

I confirm, no more devel package, at least until somebody request one.

Regards,
Jean





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]