gchemutils-main
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gchemutils-main] The Gnome Chemistry Utils 0.9.90


From: Jean Bréfort
Subject: Re: [Gchemutils-main] The Gnome Chemistry Utils 0.9.90
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:04:22 +0200

You might try attached patch and tell me if it works (not sure).

Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 18:19 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> > Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 14:36 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> >> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> >>> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 12:25 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
> >>>> Jean Bréfort pisze:
> >>>>> This is the first beta for the 0.10 releases. 
> >>>>>
> >>>>> News are: 
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CGhemPaint: 
> >>>>>       * Fixed issues about residues management.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gnome Crystal: 
> >>>>>       * Add support for document properties.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> GChemTable: 
> >>>>>       * Add Brazilian to known languages.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Other: 
> >>>>>       * Fixed some build issues (Daniel Leidert).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Updated translation: fr.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sources are at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.bz2
> >>>>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.gz
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's now time to test, and update existing translations (or add new
> >>>>> ones). Before 0.10.0, I still need to update the applications
> >>>>> documentation and write some more API docs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Jean
> >>>>>
> >>>> I was trying to update the Fedora RPM to 0.10 and I have noticed that
> >>>> the binaries and .desktop files (well, at least) contain -0.10 suffixes.
> >>>> Is this intended to stay like that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Kindest regards,
> >>>> Julian
> >>>>
> >>> Yes, it is wanted, so that different branches can be installed in
> >>> parallel. Also links are created, i.e. gchempaint -> gchempaint-0.10.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Jean
> >>>
> >> Also, is a devel package still necessary? For 0.8 it contained include
> >> files, pkgconfig file and api reference docs. None of these are
> >> installed as of 0.9.90, so I guess the devel package can go away and .so
> >> symlinks can go with the main package.
> > 
> > I confirm, no more devel package, at least until somebody request one.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jean
> > 
> All right, almost there. It turned out that gchemutils does not build on
> ppc (and probably ppc64). Tom Callaway suggested the attached fix, but
> it still does not solve the problem completely. Build log is here:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=812065&name=build.log
> 
> Regards,
> Julian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gchemutils-main mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main

Attachment: ppc.patch
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]