Re: [Gchemutils-main] The Gnome Chemistry Utils 0.9.90

[Julian Sikorski]

Jean Bréfort pisze:
> Previous patch did not work. This one should. Please test and tell me.
> 
> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 19:04 +0200, Jean Bréfort a écrit :
>> You might try attached patch and tell me if it works (not sure).
>>
>> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 18:19 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
>>> Jean Bréfort pisze:
>>>> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 14:36 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
>>>>> Jean Bréfort pisze:
>>>>>> Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 à 12:25 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
>>>>>>> Jean Bréfort pisze:
>>>>>>>> This is the first beta for the 0.10 releases. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> News are: 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CGhemPaint: 
>>>>>>>>       * Fixed issues about residues management.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gnome Crystal: 
>>>>>>>>       * Add support for document properties.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GChemTable: 
>>>>>>>>       * Add Brazilian to known languages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other: 
>>>>>>>>       * Fixed some build issues (Daniel Leidert).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Updated translation: fr.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sources are at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>> http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/gchemutils/0.9/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.9.90.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's now time to test, and update existing translations (or add new
>>>>>>>> ones). Before 0.10.0, I still need to update the applications
>>>>>>>> documentation and write some more API docs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Jean
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was trying to update the Fedora RPM to 0.10 and I have noticed that
>>>>>>> the binaries and .desktop files (well, at least) contain -0.10 suffixes.
>>>>>>> Is this intended to stay like that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it is wanted, so that different branches can be installed in
>>>>>> parallel. Also links are created, i.e. gchempaint -> gchempaint-0.10.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Jean
>>>>>>
>>>>> Also, is a devel package still necessary? For 0.8 it contained include
>>>>> files, pkgconfig file and api reference docs. None of these are
>>>>> installed as of 0.9.90, so I guess the devel package can go away and .so
>>>>> symlinks can go with the main package.
>>>> I confirm, no more devel package, at least until somebody request one.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jean
>>>>
>>> All right, almost there. It turned out that gchemutils does not build on
>>> ppc (and probably ppc64). Tom Callaway suggested the attached fix, but
>>> it still does not solve the problem completely. Build log is here:
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=812065&name=build.log
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Julian
>>>

Unfortunately the ppc build still fails:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=812287&name=build.log

Regards,
Julian