[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:17:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Aug 22 2003, Jonathan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 05:24:53PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >>Mail-Followup-To is all you need. Most people respect it these days;
> >>the rest, you just flame until they do.
> >
> >....and we just flame you back until you get a clue and use a MUA that
> >does the right thing with List-* instead of using a non-standard
> >header.
> >
> >lists.debian.org is fairly easy, anyway: list-reply-only is clearly
> >spelt out everywhere.
>
> Balogna. 'L' (list-reply-only) in mutt took one look at your message,
> which contained all the List-* headers, and it said "No list found!"
> Why are we expected to use bullshit software like this?
you need to put "lists address@hidden" in your .muttrc for that
to work.
--
brautaset.org
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, markj, 2003/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 2003/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 2003/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging,
Stig Brautaset <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26