[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert upd

From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:02:55 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 11:44:52AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > From: Jonathan Walther <address@hidden>
>     > Ain't gonna happen.  When peoples annoyance threshhold goes up, they go
>     > away.  A lot of mailing list managers won't put up with complaints from
>     > their users.  If making their members happy means breaking standards
>     > that they don't know or care about, they will do it.  Yahoo groups and
>     >, for instance.
> So, what are you supposed to do when N list members complain one way,
> and M complain another way?   Compare the magnitudes of M and N?
> It's pathetic that such a conceptually simple change to the popular
> free software MUAs isn't a practical option because it has to go
> through so few people and so many layers of process before it's widely
> available.  We should all be asking why that's the case.

Because too many people use fucking retarded MUAs. Like pine.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgp_85CxYqIwy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]