[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id |
Date: |
22 Sep 2003 12:21:55 +0900 |
Doran Moppert <address@hidden> writes:
> > The reason for changing from arch-tag: to arch-id: is because of syntax
> > changes, it's not just a name change (and arch-tag: will continue to
> > work in the `old way').
>
> can you explain that bit to me? I understand it as a "tagline syntax" change
> but the "name change" doesn't mean much to me.
arch-tag: will use the old syntax (in psuedo regexp notation):
\n WHITESPACE/PUNCUATION* arch-tag: TAG \n
arch-id: will have a different syntax:
\n .* \< arch-id: "TAG" .* \n
The old arch-tag: name/syntax has to remain so as not to cause
surprises in existing archives.
(this is my personal take on the situation; I don't know if Tom has
completely decided or not yet)
> And I think my point still stands that setting the tagline syntax using a
> regexp (per-category, not global) would be a useful generalisation of the
> change that is going to happen anyway, and allow users to recover from
> pathological conflict situations.
Perhaps, but I suspect it wouldn't be very high on the priority list
(has anyone actually needed such a feature so far?).
-Miles
--
We are all lying in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
-Oscar Wilde
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Zack Brown, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19