Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch

[Andrew Suffield]

On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:14:18AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:39:46AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > And how is it functionally different from the explicit tagging method?
> 
> the difference is that this way I don't need to think about it and all
> the discussions about what method is better or about these tagging
> issues will vanish. the whole tagging methods will go away.

[...]

> You have to remember to always put 'tla' before mv, cp, rm (mkdir
> probably too) etc.. But I find this strict behaviour as a feature. I
> don't want to risk to checkin a tree where I inserted garbage by
> mistake.

...but that's a description of explicit. Again, I do not see how you
think this is different.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature