[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees

From: Pau Aliagas
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:49:40 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Miles Bader wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:31PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> >    A fixed path for revision libraries is fine.   It should 
> >    _not_ have a mechanism for invoking a script to compute the path.
> >    Miles' requirements can be satisfied in cleaner ways.
> Which are?  As described so far, a fixed path is certainly _not_ sufficient.
> [I have this sinking feeling that the answer's going to be something like
> `Buy a bigger disk!  Buy a faster computer!']

The script could take care of everything :)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]