[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2
From: |
Samium Gromoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:38:19 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:13:27 -0700 (PDT),
Tom Lord wrote:
>
>
> > From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
>
> > However, tla-pqm isn't as "transparent" as a smart server would be. I
> > think with a little support from tla, it could be fairly nice.
>
> > For example, a tla command such as "submit-merge" would help. It would
> > do essentially what is listed in the manual:
> > (echo "From: $(tla my-id)"; echo "Subject: $1"; echo; echo star-merge
> > "$(tla tree-version)" "$2") > /usr/src/tla-pqm/patch.$(date +%s)
> > Or the user could specify to use email. It also would be good to have a
> > way to specify a default archive/revision to send merge requests to; say
> > {arch}/=3Dupstream or something. This would list both the queue
> location
> > or submit email address, as well as the archive name, so all the user
> > needs to say is "tla submit-merge -s 'fixed some bugs'".
>
> I think this is a good direction but it needs to cook more, along with
> the patch tracker foo.
>
> And I'm increasingly convinced that we want an extension language in
> which to start writing "process management" customizations. pqm
> illustrates that. The notes we've had on archivist illustrate it.
> and the notes we've had on patch trackers illustrate it.
Well, let me mention Lua on this one.
http://www.lua.org/
> People have been talking about integration with eclispe and, well,
> that's fine -- but really i think we want a whole new kind of "project
> management IDE" here.
>
> "embarassingly behind on merges but just about over the hump towards
> catching up",
> -t
regards, Samium Gromoff
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Nit, Björn Lindström, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Colin Walters, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Karel Gardas, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2,
Samium Gromoff <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/17