[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Native windows support (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language)
From: |
Joshua Haberman |
Subject: |
Re: Native windows support (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language) |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:06:00 -0700 |
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 14:20, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Joshua Haberman <address@hidden>
>
> > I would argue that a native Windows port is highly desirable right now,
> > and that any version control software that seeks to become pervasive
> > will need to run on plain Windows. The cross-platform projects I work
> > on could never move to a version control system that didn't support
> > Windows because it would isolate the contributors that use
> > Windows.
>
>
> What you describe is a shop with these characteristics:
I'm actually thinking in terms of a free software context. I hope I
have not given you the false impression that I am thinking in terms of a
company.
The main project I work on is Audacity
(http://audacity.sourceforge.net), a cross-platform audio editor that
runs on Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X. There are developers and
significant numbers of users on each platform.
In general, I prefer to commit the time of becoming intimately familiar
with a program -- in effect subscribing to it as my personal solution to
a certain problem -- to programs that are platform agnostic enough that
they can serve me on whatever platform I find myself working on. For
example:
- I have subscribed to Python as my favored programming language for
non-performance-critical use, and C++ or C for performance critical use,
because they are available and well-supported for any platform
- I have subscribed to wxWindows as my favored GUI toolkit because it is
available for most any platform
- I have subscribed to Vim as my favored editor and it is available on
every platform (of course other are too, but it's the one I chose)
- likewise CVS for version control
Do you see where I'm going with this? No matter what platform is placed
in front of me, I can be up and running writing applications with Vim,
Python or C++, wxWindows, using CVS for version control in almost no
time. I have platform-agnostic requirements. I am thinking of buying a
PowerBook sometime this year, my first Mac ever, and I won't miss a beat
because everything I've come to call my own already runs there.
> *) some programmers working on unix-family platforms
> *) some programmers working on msft-line platforms
> *) a shared line of development between the two
Yes.
> Developers specializing in work on msft platforms are likely to be
> already trained and ready to go using msft platform vc tools, horrid
> though those tools may be.
SourceSafe doesn't really enter into the picture for my situation.
> You might reply saying "Yes, but I want the msft developers to have
> all the benefits of arch," to which there are three replies:
>
> 1) Your company will be more competitive in the labor market if you
> let the msft developers stick to things like "visual source
> [un]safe".
Working on free software we don't think about such things. :)
> 2) Now you are beginning to understand why killing msft platforms is
> ultimately good for technology consumers: the costs of making
> everything work well on both unix-family and msft-line platforms
> tends not to fall well below the demand and the cost of
> developing good and lasting solutions on unix-family is
> distinctly lower.
I am afraid this doesn't really affect the reality of living in a
Microsoft-dominated world and being faced with Microsoft operating
systems frequently.
> 3) I hear that Common Lisp provides nice file system abstractions
> that work across platforms. It could be an interesting exercise
> to try to make a CL port of arch.
I am not familiar with Common Lisp, but wxBase (the non-GUI core of
wxWindows) has similarly useful abstractions for dealing with files and
filenames in a platform-independent way. See:
http://www.wxwindows.org/manuals/2.4.1/wx144.htm
> It's a nice fantasy to wish for a world in which platforms and
> applications were independent, but as they say, "If wishes and buts
> were candy and nuts....."
Audacity runs today and is in widespread use on three different
platforms. We demand more system-specific support than arch ever will,
since audio i/o APIs are significantly different from platform to
platform. We also use eight third-party free software libraries, all of
which are also portable to all our target platforms:
wxWindows
expat
libid3tag
libsndfile
soundtouch
libmad
libogg
libsamplerate
libvorbis
portaudio
It takes work, but the result is worth it.
> I am curious: what is the _current_ solution you use for
> multi-platform development? Is it ad hoc? Nonexistent? Is it CVS?
> If it's CVS, then the existing arch<->CVS bridges already give you a
> handy solution.
It's CVS. My gut reaction is that the hassle of maintaining two
version-control systems would outweigh the benefits of using arch.
Josh
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, zander, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Miles Bader, 2003/10/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, zander, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Topicality, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Miles Bader, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Joshua Haberman, 2003/10/18
- Native windows support (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language), Tom Lord, 2003/10/18
- Re: Native windows support (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language),
Joshua Haberman <=
- Re: Native windows support (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language), Colin Walters, 2003/10/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Native windows support, zander, 2003/10/19
- Re: Native windows support (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language), Karel Gardas, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Tom Lord, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/17