Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch status on debian

[zander]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:44:55PM +0100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 03:29:51PM +0100, wave++ said
> > Shouldn't debian "unstable" carry on the "unstable" tla package instead
> > of the (IMHO) obsolete 1.0? 
> 
> "snapshot" packages should go into the experimental distribution of
> Debian, not unstable.
> 
> Daily snapshots of tla are available from here, however:
> 
> deb http://people.debian.org/~asuffield/arch/ ./

Since this is a public list, I'd like to add that the above dep line is
based on unstable and will not work with testing.

-- 
Thomas Zander