[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:26:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Here's a healthy dose of reality: we live in a world that has failed
> to produce an adequete replacement for Fortran-77, a language
> without structured loop statements. I don't think any language has
> much to be proud of.
Fortran-77 has DO loops. No WHILE or similar things, but in its
domain those aren't so important. More important is Fortran-77's lack
of user defined data types, I'd have thought. And what's wrong with
Fortran-9x/95/2001 as replacements?
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: OT: Lisp, Miles Bader, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Doran, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Tom Lord, 2003/11/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Clark McGrew, 2003/11/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/18