[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE

From: Samuel Tardieu
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:02:32 +0100
User-agent: T-gnus/6.16.2 (based on Gnus v5.10.2) (revision 02) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:

> That seems silly to me.  In practice, I don't think anyone will use
> anything else.

Why not? While I favour GnuPG, I know some people who will want to use
X.509 signatures generated by the "openssl" command-line program[1].


[1] A future version of GnuPG will also use X.509 signatures.
Samuel Tardieu -- address@hidden --

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]