gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE


From: Brian May
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:28:57 +1100
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
    >> That seems silly to me.  In practice, I don't think anyone will
    >> use anything else.

    Samuel> Why not? While I favour GnuPG, I know some people who will
    Samuel> want to use X.509 signatures generated by the "openssl"
    Samuel> command-line program[1].

I think both GnuPG and X.509 signature support would be a good thing.

Sure, you might not want to implement both now, but if we used
detached signatures, at least it would make it easier for somebody to
implement at a later date.
-- 
Brian May <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]