[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE
From: |
Brian May |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:28:57 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
>> That seems silly to me. In practice, I don't think anyone will
>> use anything else.
Samuel> Why not? While I favour GnuPG, I know some people who will
Samuel> want to use X.509 signatures generated by the "openssl"
Samuel> command-line program[1].
I think both GnuPG and X.509 signature support would be a good thing.
Sure, you might not want to implement both now, but if we used
detached signatures, at least it would make it easier for somebody to
implement at a later date.
--
Brian May <address@hidden>
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Robert Collins, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Robert Collins, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE,
Brian May <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Geert Stappers, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, James Blackwell, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, James Blackwell, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/22