[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE

From: Colin Walters
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:58:35 -0500

On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 08:30, Rob Kaper wrote:

> With detached signatures you could avoid all this, because the original file
> is untouched - you would just sign the .gz and wouldn't even have to make
> md5sums anymore.

Nah...there's two files, the log and the patches.tar.gz.  It's cleaner
to have a checksum file and just sign that, instead of having two

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]