[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server,
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:28:51 -0500 |
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:53, Mirian Crzig Lennox wrote:
> address@hidden (Colin Walters) writes:
> >
> > I've been working on a "smart server" over the past few days. There's a
> > lot to talk about, so I'll try to break it up into cleanly separated
> > parts.
>
> Colin, I really like the direction you've taken here. I think it
> makes a lot of sense to focus on a well-specified, robust wire
> protocol, and leave the backend filestore mechanism as a detail
> outside of Arch's concern.
Yep, it gives us a lot of flexibility.
> Decoupling the two not only would allow more independent development
> along those lines, but raises the possibility of interesting
> compatibility layers and gateways (such as an archd which speaks
> cvspserver protocol, my own pet project).
Interesting. Sounds fairly challenging. How far along are you on this?
> I hope you won't mind a couple of nitpicks, as it took a tiny bit of
> sleuthing for me to get your sources:
>
> > The tla implementation is here:
> > address@hidden/tla--archd--1.2
> >
> > The archd server is here:
> > address@hidden/tla--main--0
>
> The latter should actually be: address@hidden/archd--main--0
> And the location of address@hidden is http://arch.verbum.org/arch
Yep, sorry :)
> You mention that your code is "ugly", but I found it readable enough,
> and I don't even know Python. :)
Oh, I think the Python is good too :) I was referring to my tla
hacking... You'd have to really try quite deliberately to make Python
ugly.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Robert Collins, 2004/01/30
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Bruce Stephens, 2004/01/30
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server,, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/30
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server,,
Colin Walters <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Scott Parish, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Robin Green, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Colin Walters, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Scott Parish, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Scott Parish, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Scott Parish, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RFC: arch protocol, smart server, and tla implementation prototypes, Colin Walters, 2004/01/30